In my opinion, writing is the simple act of translating
thoughts within the brain onto a tangible technology such as paper. Writing includes grocery lists, poems,
graffiti, and any other words on a tangible source. To me, technology is something that at one
point was an innovation. I know that
there are many scholars who argue that technology is much more roadd than the
definition I provided, but I do not agree.
For instance, take writing Hieroglyphics on cave walls in ancient
Egypt. In this scenario, I do not see
the cave wall as a technology because it was always there. It was never an innovation. The technology in this scenario is the tool
that was used to etch into the cave wall.
Even though the tool might have been there the whole time, it was
serving a new, innovative purpose.
Circulation, to me, is when writing became a tool of change as opposed
to a means or recording. Circulation has
to be written as opposed to orally translated.
Circulation became possible when the printing press was invented and
writing became a tool of persuasion, not merely a means of recording
history. I believe this is also when
rhetoric was officially invented because with circulation comes the power of persuasion. The printing press let one person’s voice be
heard on a large scale without any geographical barriers. Without circulation, one had to be in the
same place as the orator in order to hear the speaker’s persuasion. So, in short, writing is the simple act of
translating thoughts onto a tangible platform.
In order to write, one needs a technology to transfer the thoughts to
paper, such as pen and paper. These are
technologies. Circulation is delivering
the message that one writes to an audience outside of the individual’s physical
location. Writing cannot exist
independently from technology although writing and technology can exist
independent of circulation. Though when
one thinks of the modern day definition writing, one often think that circulation
accompanies it. Writing, technology, and
circulation make up today’s definition of rhetoric.
No comments:
Post a Comment