When I
think of a hypertext, a “Choose your own Adventure” book comes to mind. This is
also how Neal describes a hypertext on page 79 as “Linked texts.” Before I begin to discuss the
allowances of a hypertext, I must admit I do not fully understand the definition.
Neal’s explanation makes sense in relation to modern connotations. What does
not fit this image so easily is Stroupe’s definition. I do not see the
relationship between “verbal and nonverbal information,” in the way it is
described in the context of this paper at least. Unless the nonverbal
information is the unwritten understanding between author and audience on how
to use the text (i.e. proper use of a table of contents) the meaning eludes me
and I would appreciate it if you would explain this in class. I see hypertexts
having two main allowances. The first is the ability to elaborate without
distraction. The second is to allow the audience a more interactive role with
the text. The first point, elaboration, is a tool for the author. It relates more
towards footnotes or literal hyperlinks on a Wikipedia article. Hyperlinks in
this context let an author continue a stream of consciousness without
interruption. Background or other relevant information can be linked and
forgotten and not disturb the flow of the writing. This can decrease wordiness
or length of the main text. The original example of a “Choose your own
Adventure” book is a way the author utilizes the second point, audience
interaction. This tool allows the author to relinquish control to the audience
to interact with it in different ways. Instead of having only one way to
interact with the text, there are many or even infinite ways. Another example
would be a basic webpage. There is no limit to the way a user can scroll
between pages. On a Wikipedia page, a user can jump to any section of the
article using the table of contents at the top of the page. This method does
not require technology though. Neal points out that portfolios also offer this
allowance. The audience can view the portfolio in any order. This is an example
of how control can be relinquished unwillingly because the creator of the works
may have a specific order in mind, but it is unenforceable.
No comments:
Post a Comment