The article starts off by talking about how the type of
writing students are creating now a days is quite different form the writing
people were used to seeing in the 20th century, this is in part due
to hypertexts. To put quite simply you don’t need to be a computer wiz to
understand what exactly a hypertext is. A hyper text is simply a link a writer
add to their piece which views can click on to direct them to a different page.
This page is typically full of useful information pertaining to the writer’s
original text. Hypertexts are so useful because they make it so easy for writers
to make their work so much denser and chalk full of useful information.
Although “While a portion of writing teachers find these new texts and techs
compelling and exciting, others are wary, fearing that we may not be able to
adjust to or manage 21st-century literacies. “ I choose only to see the good in
incorporating hypertexts into my own work as a writer. We are living in a
digital age as we have emphasized quite frequently throughout this semester.
You can either swim or sink the way I see it, and hypertexts are going to keep
you afloat. Hypertexts can add so much to your rhetoric, giving you more to
back up your opinion on and also making it easy for your readers to follow
along with the supplementary information the hypertexts provide. Hypertext also
give a writer a great deal of mobility; “Hypertechs and digi- tal texts are
dynamic, multimodal, interactive, and connected. They can be produced,
reproduced, written, and rewritten with relative ease and flexibility and
distributed more broadly than ever before almost instantly. “ The addition of
hypertexts to one’s writing make the writing accecable to a much larger and
more broad audience, therefore giving the piece much better chance of
circulation. They also keep pieces more interesting visually and content wise.
The addition of the hypertexts really aid in making the reader feel more immersed
and involved in what they are reading, versus simply scanning page after page
of nothing but writing. All in all hypertexts are great writing tools that
should not be feared, but should be embraced in writing in this digital age we
live in.
Tuesday, December 6, 2016
Journal #7 - Jack Quinn
Hypertexts are the way of the
future. My first experience in learning the value of hypertexts came from a
music website that I frequently read. The article was in regards to the new
release of an artist that I had been following. The writer had included links
throughout his article that first linked to the timeline of the public
announcements tied to the new album. Each click would bring me to a tweet or
public statement that added more information to the release of the new music.
Next the author linked several charts and studies and looked at the popularity
of the artist overall and of artists who make music of the same genre.
This instance was the first time it
occurred to me how helpful hypertexts can be. The ability to tie other studies
and authors to your own work, with a single click, has potential to revolutionize
the way we view and consume information.
However, hypertexts are not without
their problems. With the ability to easily link outside sources comes the risk
of said sources being false or misleading. This is a criticism that many news
outlets such as fox or cnn constantly face.
At one point the author also
addresses the point that many make regarding social media platforms: “While a
portion of writing teachers find these new texts and techs compelling and
exciting, others are wary, fearing that we may not be able to adjust to or
manage 21st-century literacies. While most writing teachers understood the
value of incorporating early digital technologies such as word processing into
the classroom, some of the newer digital technologies many be less apparently
connection to our pedagogy and curriculum: wikis, blogs, digital video, social
networking (e.g., MySpace, Facebook, and Twitter) and social bookmarking (e.g.,
del.icio.us and Diigo), and the expanding range of audio/visual technologies
(e.g., Flickr, YouTube, Wardle, Prezi, and Vuvox).” He then quickly disregards
this, instead appreciating this widening spectrum of platforms for writing and
ideas. In my opinion, this forward way of thinking is both exciting and
productive. Hypertexts are something that people can now learn naturally as
they are both fun and deeply engrained in our society.
Eric Calderon- Journal 7
I think the major considerations that we need to make for reading a hypertext is how this will help someone expand on their creativity—rather than to just teach the mechanics of a computer. It’s something that was talked about during the seminar last week with Dr. Yancy, when she discussed that most schools will just teach their students how to use softwares like Microsoft Office. Although it is important to teach these students how to use these types of programs, there still lies a big problem with these ways of teaching. The problem is that there aren’t many teachings for these young students that encourage any type of initiative to go beyond what the basics are and to be more creative while doing so. So the main idea that you would have to think of when reading a hypertext would be to understand what the author’s creative intent might be when making their given hypertext.
For example, using different types of formats and medias can alter the way we think while reading a specific hypertext. There are ways—like using pictures—that can help manipulate the audience to either lean for or against a specific audience that might be viewing this hypertext. You might want to consider why the author is choosing to use specific formats, and if it was meant to change your view of that specific topic, or if there was potentially a different motive behind the intent. Overall, readers should cautious when reading certain hyper texts, especially when it can be possible if the author did not include all of the information that can either alter or reinforce your opinion on a given topic.
Also—in terms of making these hypertexts interactive—with the emergence of comment sections at the end of some hypertexts, a viewer can go straight to the bottom of the hypertext after they read it and view the opinions of “normal” people to help confirm if they either agree or disagree with the hypertext.
#7 Audrey Wheeler
In reading a hypertext, it is primarily important to recognize and consider the creator’s intentions. The composition of the written (or rather, typed) words will follow the author’s intentions to a specific format, primarily due to the fact that these hypertexts are a specifically chosen method of writing. The creator themself may not even label their own expression as “writing” and as such it may not carry as much weight to them as perceived by the reader. The initial self assessment within a hypertext may be devoid of guidelines, so much so that the author possesses very little opportunity to reflect and enhance upon the truly valuable pieces of what they have brought into existence.
Additionally, due to the developments of hypermedia and their incorporation into texts, readers must be aware of all the additional sensory components available to them within these parameters. The Manovich and New London Models align in their categorizations; however, Manovich’s deals more in specific methods whereas New London’s is framed by the effects these methods will indulge the readers in. By that, the reader needs to be much more aware of the New London concepts of hypermedia as these effects will change how a reader perceives the knowledge they are provided with. A short video with no citations is eye-catching on Facebook and easily spread, but it could very well be full of false information that the reader no longer recognizes simply because the format of presentation has changed from linguistic and visual to visual and audio.
A last primary consideration for readers when faced with hypertexts is simply to analyze them both from the method of delivery and the information presented. Is a video shot well? Too many close-ups? Does this affect how the reader perceives the information? In an article with photos, is the author hiding or enhancing the information? Are there too many visual components? Hypermedia possesses an innumerable number of ways and manners to develop writing further than it has ever metamorphosed before, but if the information and presentation are not both fully considered by the reader, the value of the writing is lost.
Journal 7- Marin
In my opinion, the first assumption one must make for
reading in a hypertext is that each individual reader is going to have a
different experience upon reading the hypertext. Neal notes in his reading, “Since the assumption,
though false, is that print texts are to be read from beginning to end”. I believe that Neal encapsulates a lot in
this sentence. With previous texts in
the twentieth century, there was never any question as to the order in which
the text would be experienced. The
Western world reads left to right, top to bottom, and there was no opportunity
for variance. When the Internet (and
therefore hypertexts) was created, this gave way to allowing the audience to
make their experience of the text their own.
When adding another text as a segment of a different text, this
introduces many more elements. Between
the original text and the linked text, the tone will be different, the biases
will be different, and the overall message is also likely to be different. Overall what I’m trying to say is that the
spectrum for interpretation expands greatly when another text with many
different variables in introduced.
Another consideration to keep in mind when reading in a
hypertext is that the name “hypertext” alone implies twenty-first century
writing. And with twenty-first century
writing comes the implication that the text you are experiencing has likely
been shaped entirely by media that has preceded it. The fact that the piece references a
different media at all (the hypertext) is a sign that the piece you are reading
was assembled through themes and ideas created by another author.
Finally, because of these considerations, it is important to
remember that the ideas and messages the reader draws from the text will likely
be original and different to the other people experiencing the same text. Because nearly all text today is a form of
remediation, this means that each new remediation introduces an original idea
based off of the text. Text these days
is interesting because ideas and messages are all interwoven into ideas and
messages created by previous authors. It
is important to recognize the different sources that a hypertext introduces.
Journal #7 Falyn Tover
Hypertech's, according to this article, are texts
that possesses "extravagance" and "excess." These texts can
be produced and reproduced, written and re-written. This is mostly because of
the fact that these techs are written on digital platforms.
While some professors
believe that digital techs cause students to lose their literacy and learn incorrect
grammar, the author of this article argues that it can be taught in a way that
shows the students how writing is evolving and how we change our writing
depending on who is our audience.
The author also writes
that when it comes to reading Hypertechs, there is an organization to it. There
is a path to read these certain texts. He explains that if you just read the
ending of a book, you would be very confused. This is the case for Hypertechs
as well.
Journal #7 - Megan Quinn
Hypertext is an inflated text,
writing combined with a digital component. Unique to hypertext is its nonlinear
approach to movement. A person can navigate a hypertext in any direction they
see fit and still have the information coherently make sense. A story that
stuck out from Hyperactive Hypertechs
was how a student did not consider his blog to be writing in the sense of work
composed in a classroom. This implies hypertexts are somehow less significant
or acceptable. This stood out to me because it illustrates the limited scope of
what is considered “real” or “good” writing. Hypertext, or digital writing,
could be considered its own genre and accepted as a legitimate writing source.
Although not at all Facebook or Tumblr posts are gold mines, people do write
genuinely on social media sites and more weight should be given to their
writing.
Different considerations for a
hypertext have to be given depending on what type it is. News outlets are
popular across the Internet and people often have their favorite sources they
automatically go to, whether it be CNN, FOX, or BBC. However, thanks to social
media, news articles are posted and shared across feeds and people click to
read the stories without considering where they come from. At this moment, the
reliable news sources are reporting on the dangers of fake news stories, in
particular how they may have affected the presidential election. People need to
learn not to trust everything they read on the Internet, as ridiculous as the
idea sounds, because it can have harmful effects. One of Gallagher’s main points
in his article was context. If readers give attention to context, it will raise
their awareness of a hypertext and how its information should be taken.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)